e3value user guide
The net value flow sheet of a partnership consolidates that of the participating actors, except that the internal expenses of the actors are not included in the partnership value flow. Figure 6.5 shows a partnership of a Railway company and a Caterer. Table 6.8 shows the consolidated value flow sheet for the partnership and table 6.9 shows that the caterer has expenses not included in the value flows of the partnership.
Interface | Port | Transfers | Transfer occurrences | Valuation | Total value transferred | Net value flow |
Money, Money, train trip, food |
|
| 10 |
|
| 2100 |
| in: Money | all | 10 | 10 | 100 |
|
| in: Money | all | 10 | 200 | 2000 |
|
| out: train trip | all | 10 | 0 | 0 |
|
| out: food | all | 10 | 0 | 0 |
|
2100 |
||||||
|
Interface | Port | Transfers | Transfer occurrences | Valuation | Total value transferred | Net value flow |
Money, food |
|
| 10 |
|
| 50 |
| in: Money | all | 10 | 10 | 100 |
|
| out: food | all | 10 | 0 | 0 |
|
| out: food | Variable expenses | 10 | 5 | -50 |
|
50 |
||||||
|
An actor may participate in a partnership and at the same time do independent business. This may result in a port connected with reciprocal and forwarding transfers at the same time.
In figure 6.6, the interface of the Railway company is connected to the partnership interface with a forwarding transfer and to the Corporate traveler through reciprocal transfers. In transactions through the partnership interface it will use the valuations of that interface but in transactions witgh the Corporate traveler it will use the price set for or agreed with the Corporate traveler.
Interface | Port | Transfers | Transfer occurrences | Valuation | Total value transferred | Net value flow |
Money, train trip |
|
| 30 |
|
| 5.8 K |
| in: Money | tf1 | 20 | 190 | 3.8 K |
|
| in: Money | tf2 | 10 | 200 | 2 K |
|
| out: train trip | all | 30 | 0 | 0 |
|
5.8 K |
||||||
|